Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://repositorio.ugto.mx/handle/20.500.12059/10470Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.rights.license | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 | es_MX |
| dc.creator | IGNACIO GARCIA MARIN | es_MX |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-18T02:52:47Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-03-18T02:52:47Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-01-17 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorio.ugto.mx/handle/20.500.12059/10470 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | La presente investigación analiza el sistema de partidos peruano entre 2001 y 2022 a través de un estudio longitudinal y comparado. En este período, se destaca una muy baja institucionalización del sistema de partidos, crecientes tensiones entre el Ejecutivo y el Legislativo y una progresiva fragmentación y atomización del Congreso. Esta fagocitación partidaria tuvo su reflejo en el Ejecutivo, donde doce presidentes ocuparon el cargo y se iniciaron ocho procesos de vacancia, pero también en el Legislativo, con una elevada volatilidad y dificultad para alcanzar mayorías. Así, el Perú se ha configurado como un interesante estudio de caso sobre los efectos que un sistema de partidos de baja institucionalización puede generar para el conjunto del sistema político y la importancia del análisis de esta variable. En este sentido, se evidencian los efectos nocivos en ambos poderes y para la gobernabilidad, así como la ausencia de indicadores que atestigüen una posible consolidación. | es_MX |
| dc.language.iso | spa | es_MX |
| dc.publisher | Universidad de Guanajuato | es_MX |
| dc.relation | https://doi.org/10.15174/remap.v12i24.411 | es_MX |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_MX |
| dc.source | Revista Mexicana de Análisis Político y Administración Pública (REMAP). Vol. 12 Núm. 24 (2023) : Dossier: Ciclos y cambio en la competencia partidista en América Latina | es_MX |
| dc.title | Fragmentación, polarización y baja institucionalización del sistema de partidos. El caso peruano entre 2001 y 2022. | es_MX |
| dc.title.alternative | Fragmentation, Polarization, And Low Institutionalization of The Party System. The Peruvian Case Between 2001 And 2022. | en |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_MX |
| dc.creator.id | info:eu-repo/dai/mx/cvu/898557 | es_MX |
| dc.subject.cti | info:eu-repo/classification/cti/5 | es_MX |
| dc.subject.cti | info:eu-repo/classification/cti/59 | es_MX |
| dc.subject.keywords | Partidos políticos | es_MX |
| dc.subject.keywords | Sistema de partidos | es_MX |
| dc.subject.keywords | Institucionalización | es_MX |
| dc.subject.keywords | Relaciones Ejecutivo - Legislativo | es_MX |
| dc.subject.keywords | Perú | es_MX |
| dc.subject.keywords | Peru | en |
| dc.subject.keywords | Executive - Legislative Relations | en |
| dc.subject.keywords | Institutionalization | en |
| dc.subject.keywords | Party System | en |
| dc.subject.keywords | Party Politics | en |
| dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_MX |
| dc.description.abstractEnglish | This research analyzes the Peruvian party system between 2001 and 2022 through a longitudinal and comparative study. During this period, a very low institutionalization of the party system, growing tensions between the executive and the legislature, and progressive fragmentation and atomization of Congress stand out. This party fragmentation was reflected in the executive, where 12 presidents held office and eight vacancy processes were initiated, but also in the legislature, with high volatility and difficulty in reaching majorities. Thus, Peru has become an interesting case study on the effects that a party system with low institutionalization can have on the political system as a whole and the importance of analyzing this variable. In this sense, the harmful effects on both powers and governance are evidenced, as well as the absence of indicators that attest to possible consolidation. | en |
| dc.description.abstractEnglish | This research analyzes the Peruvian party system between 2001 and 2022 through a longitudinal and comparative study. During this period, a very low institutionalization of the party system, growing tensions between the executive and the legislature, and progressive fragmentation and atomization of Congress stand out. This party fragmentation was reflected in the executive, where 12 presidents held office and eight vacancy processes were initiated, but also in the legislature, with high volatility and difficulty in reaching majorities. Thus, Peru has become an interesting case study on the effects that a party system with low institutionalization can have on the political system as a whole and the importance of analyzing this variable. In this sense, the harmful effects on both powers and governance are evidenced, as well as the absence of indicators that attest to possible consolidation. | en |
| Appears in Collections: | Revista Mexicana de Análisis Político y Administración Pública | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fragmentación, polarización y baja institucionalización del sistema de partidos. El caso peruano entre 2001 y 2022.pdf | 369.46 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.